The Biden administration issued a subpoena seeking details of the Guardian reporter’s phone


<span>Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images</span>” src=”–/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQyMw–/ YrqtfklQbQ–~B/aD02MDA7dz05OTk7YXBwaWQ9eXRhY2h5b24-/″ data-src=” -/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQyMw–/–~B/aD02MDA7dz05OTk7YXBwaWQ9eXRhY2h5b24-/ “/></div>
<p><figcaption class=Photography: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The subpoena that was used by the US Department of Justice to obtain details of a Guardian reporter’s phone account, as part of an investigation into the leaks, was issued by the Biden administration in the first weeks of Joe Biden’s presidency.

In a statement to The Guardian, the Justice Department’s Inspector General’s Office confirmed that the subpoena was issued in February 2021 – shortly after Biden entered the White House. The action was taken in an effort to guess the identity of an alleged financial backer, suspected of leaking to news outlets details of an investigation into the previous Trump administration’s policy of separating the children from their parents at the southern border of the United States.

Related: US secretly issued subpoena to access Guardian reporter’s phone records

See also  Kellyanne Conway likely killed Americans by changing CDC's COVID guidelines for churches

On Thursday it emerged that the DoJ had secretly used a subpoena to confirm the phone number of Stephanie Kirchgaessner, the Guardian’s investigations correspondent. She had authored two reports in 2020 that revealed sensitive aspects of the child separation policy, including that Donald Trump’s Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein gave the go-ahead for children of all ages to be removed from their parents.

It was unclear at the time which administration was responsible for issuing the subpoena, as the investigation into the leaks had overlapped with the Trump and Biden administrations. Now, the DoJ Inspector General’s Office has clarified that the decision was made during the Biden administration.

Stephanie Logan, a spokesperson for the Inspector General’s Office which acts as the DoJ’s internal watchdog and which was leading the investigation into the children’s separation, told the Guardian the subpoena was issued in February 2021 in accordance with “justice manual requirements”.

See also  Dr. Oz took a swipe at Biden during a Trump rally for the Pennsylvania Senate nominee, saying the only thing the president "rebuilt better" was "the Republican Party."

The subpoena, she said, had been issued to a telecommunications company to confirm that “a specific phone number already known to investigators … actually belonged to a specific media outlet.” Investigators knew the phone number — Kirchgaessner’s, though Logan did not refer to the reporter by name — from their previous review of phone records for an official in the Inspector General’s office suspected of being source of the leak.

Logan pointed out that “the subpoena did not request, and investigators did not receive, the content of communications to or from the account holder’s phone number” or any other phone account details.

The disclosure of the use of a subpoena to confirm the phone number of a Guardian reporter in a case that did not involve national security or classified information has drawn heavy criticism. Guardian editor Katharine Viner called the DoJ’s action “a blatant example of an assault on press freedom and public interest journalism”.

See also  President Pelosi is the highest US official to visit Ukraine

In July 2021, the DoJ under newly appointed Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland announced a new policy that promised to restrict the use of the “compulsory process to obtain information or records from members of the news media acting in the context of the collection of information”. Activities.” Proponents of increased federal protections for the press, however, have complained about the Biden administration’s lackluster support for tougher protective laws.

Last summer, Ron Wyden, the U.S. senator from Oregon, introduced new legislation to protect journalists from unnecessary government surveillance in response to revelations about the Trump administration’s heavy-handed surveillance of TNZT reporters, the New York Times and other media. Wyden told the Freedom of the Press Foundation at the time that he tried to get Justice Department support for his new press law, but Biden administration officials did not. managed to engage.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here